The Takfir of Umar by Hazrat Fatema Zahra (sa)

This is what  Hazrat Fatema, peace be upon her, said when they wanted to take
Fadak from her:

“O’ People, haven’t you heard from the Prophet, peace be upon him and his family, that
he said: Indeed, my daughter Fatima is the Chief Mistress of Women in Paradise?’
They said: ‘By God, yes. We have heard that from the Prophet, peace be upon him and
his family.’

She said: ‘Then is it logical for the Chief Mistress of Women in Paradise to claim
something which is false and doesn’t belong to her?! If four people bear witnessed that I
committed an obscenity or two people claimed I stole, would you believe them over me?’

Abu Bakr stayed silent, Umar responded: ‘Yes, and we would apply the appropriate
punishment.’

She said: ‘You liar! If you do so, then you are on a religion other than the religion of
Muhammad, peace be upon him and his family. If someone asks the Chief Mistress of
Women in Paradise for witnesses or tries to apply punishment on her is an accursed
individual, a disbeliever in what Allah has sent down upon Muhammad, peace be upon
him and his family. Those whom Allah has protected them from impurity and purified
them a thorough purification are not needed to be asked for witnesses, because they are
infallible from every error, purified from every sin. Tell me O’ Umar about this verse. If a
group of people witnessed that those individuals referred to in that verse committed
polytheism, or disbelief, or obscenity; would the Muslims disassociate from them and
apply punishment?’

Umar said: ‘Yes, they and the rest of the people are equal.’

She said: ‘You liar and disbeliever! How are they equal to the rest of the people? Those
individuals referred in that verse were purified by God and made infallible. Whomever
provides a testimony against them, has attributed lies to Allah and His Prophet.”


Fatimat al-Zahraa Bahjat Qalb al-Mustafa, page 307

EID E ZAHRA (SA) MUBARAK - THE GREATNESS OF 9TH RABI AL AWAL

The 9th of Rabi al-Awwal is a day of great status for the Household of infallibility
and purity, peace be upon them, as they consider this day one of the greatest Eids. This is
evident as the Imams, peace be upon them, used to hold celebration gatherings. Not only
that, but they used to order their Shia and their followers to take that day as Eid and
celebrate. The status of that day has reached a very high position that the Imams, peace
be upon them, has identified that day as ‘The second Ghadeer’, considering that Eid al-
Ghadeer is considered the greatest Eid.
To prove the greatness of that day, we will mention this one hadith reported by
the great scholar, Allamah Muhammad Baqir al-Majlisi, may Allah bless his soul:
“On the author of Muhammad ibn al-Alaa al-Wasiti and Yahya ibn Muhammad ibn
Jareeh al-Bagdadhi, they said: ‘We engaged in debates over the situation of Ibn al-
Khattab and became confused over this matter so all of us went to Ahmad ibn Ishaq al-
Qomi, a companion of Imam Abi Hassan al-Askari (Imam al-Hadi), peace be upon him,
in the city of Qom. We knocked on his door, and a young Iraqi girl answered the door.
We asked her about him, she responded: ‘He is busy, as today is a day of Eid.’
We said: ‘Subhan’Allah! The Shia have four Eids: al-Adha, al-Fitr, al-Ghadeer, and
Fridays.’
She said: ‘Ahmad ibn Ishaq narrates from his Master Abi Hassan, Ali Ibn Muhammad al-
Askar (al-Hadi), peace be upon them, that this day is a day of Eid, and it is among the
greatest of Eids for the Ahlulbayt, peace be upon them, and for their followers.’
We said: ‘Ask him for permission to enter his house, and tell him where we are’.
She then went inside and told him. He came out wearing nice clothes, wiping his face.We criticized him for this. He said to us: ‘Nothing is on you, I was doing ghusul as today
is a day of Eid.’
We asked: ‘Today is a day of Eid?’
He said: ‘Yes.’ And it was the 9th of Rabi al-Awwal. He welcomed us into his house and
sat us on a cushion.

The House of Fatema Zahra (sa) .... The Hijaab of Allah (swt)

Kitab al-Wassiyah 

كتاب الطرف للسيد علي بن طاووس نقلا من كتاب الوصية للشيخ عيسى بن المستفاد الضرير

From" Kitab al-Turf" of Sayed ibn Taoos quoting from Kitab al-Wassiyah of Shaikh Isa bin al-Mustafaad al-Zareer

عن موسى بن جعفر، عن أبيه (عليهما السلام) قال

 Imam Musa bin Jafar al-Kazim (as) from his Father (as):

لما حضرت رسول الله (صلى الله عليه وآله) الوفاة دعا الانصار وقال … ألا إن فاطمة بابها بابي وبيتها بيتي، فمن هتكه فقد هتك حجاب الله "، قال عيسى: فبكى أبو الحسن (عليه السلام) طويلا، وقطع بقية كلامه  وقال: 

هتك والله حجاب الله، هتك والله حجاب الله، هتك والله حجاب الله يا امه صلوات الله عليها

"When Prophet Mohammad (saww) was about to die, He called the Ansaar's and said, ... "Indeed the door of Fatema (sa) is My door, and Her house is My house. So whoever disgraces it has disgraced the Hijaab (veil/covering) of Allah" (swt).

The narrator Isa then says, "Abu al-Hasan Imam Kazim (as) then cried for long and cut of 

rest of his speech and said,

  "By Allah (swt) the Hijaab of Allah (swt) was disgraced, 

By Allah (swt) the Hijaab of Allah (swt) was disgraced, 

By Allah (swt) the Hijaab of Allah (swt) was disgraced, 

O My Mother (sa)..."

[Source: Bihar al-Anwar, Vol. 22, Pg. 476-477]

_________________________________________________________________________

يارب محمد عجل فرج آل محمد

 يارب محمد أحفظ غيبة أبنه محمد

 يارب محمـــد أنتقم لأبنه محمـــد

"O Lord of Muhammad! Hasten the reappearance of the progeny of Muhammad. 

O Lord of Muhammad! Protect the occultation of Muhammad. 

O Lord of Muhammad! Hasten the revenge of daughter of Muhammad.”

LAMENTATION OF HAZRAT ZAHRA (SA) UPON IMAM HUSSAIN (AS)

It is written in the book Kamiluz Ziyarat ( chp 26 tdn no 7) : 

Abu Basir says: I was speaking with Imam Sadiq (a.s.) when one of his sons entered. Imam (a.s.) said: ‘May Allah bless you’; and then embraced and kissed him.

Then he (as) said: ‘May Allah degrade those who dishonored you. May Allah avenge those who oppressed you. May Allah disappoint those who deserted you. May Allah curse those who slain you. May Allah be your guardian, protector and helper. Prophets, truthful ones, martyrs, angels of the heavens and our ladies have been weeping on you’.

Then Imam (a.s.) began to weep and said: ‘Abu Basir, when I look at the children of Imam Husain (a.s.), grief overcomes me when I remember what was meted out to them and to their father.’

‘Abu Basir, Fatima (s.a.) weeps and laments over Husain (a.s.) as a result of which Hell sighs so intensely, that if the keepers of Hell who also hear her voice did not prepare themselves to restrain it, it would burn all the inhabitants of the earth with its blazing fires and sparking fumes. So the keepers restrain it and hold its doors tightly closed as long as Fatima (s.a.) laments. Because they fear for the inhabitants of the earth. But Hell is not pacified until Fatima’s lamentation ends.’

‘Abu Basir, the seas almost split apart and collide with each other. There is a dedicated angel for every drop of water and they prevent every drop from boiling with their wings; keeping it together because of their fear for this world and everything in it. The angels remain in fear and cry for her crying. And they pray to Allah and beseech Him, after which the inhabitants of the Arsh and those around it beg Allah.’

visit the blog  http://theziyaratofashurah.wordpress.com/

‘Then their voices are raised in glorification of Allah, all because of their fear for the people of the earth. Even if one of their voices reached the earth, all the inhabitants would swoon, mountains would crumble and the earth would shake with its inhabitants.’

Abu Basir said, “May I be sacrificed on you! It is really a serious matter.”

Imam (a.s.) said, “That which you have not heard is greater. Abu Basir! Don’t you want to be of those who support Lady Fatima (s.a.)?”

When I heard this, I cried so much that I could not speak nor could the Imam (a.s.) do, because he was crying so intensely. Then he went to his prayer room and began to recite a supplication.

So I left the Imam in that state. I could not eat or sleep that night. The following morning, I was fasting and was in extreme fear when I went to Imam (a.s.). I heaved as sigh of relief when I saw that he had calmed down; and I praised and glorified Allah, because no chastisement or calamity had befallen me

Building Mosques Over Graves - ON THE SAD OCCASION OF THE DESTRUCTION OF THE GRAVES OF JANNATUL BAQI BY THE WAHABIS ( 8TH SHAWWAL)

Pre-Islamic instances of mosques built over graves:

The following list is merely indicative and should not be treated as exhaustive:

1. Prophet Dawood (a.s.) in Quds, Israel

2. Prophet Ibrahim (a.s.) in Hebron, Israel

3. Prophet Is’haaq (a.s.) in Hebron

4. Prophet Yaqoob (a.s.) in Hebron

5. Prophet Yusuf (a.s.) in Hebron

All these graves were elevated structures of stones and remained in this condition even after the spread of Islam in Quds. (Kashf al-Irteyaab, pg 306)

Even Ibn Taimiyyah admits that the structure over Prophet Ibrahim’s (a.s.) grave existed when Islam reached Hebron and in the very presence of companions, none of whom raised any objection. Only thing is the door to the mausoleum (of Prophet Ibrahim (a.s.)) remained closed till 400 AH.
(Majma’ al-Fataawaa of Ibn Taimiyyah vol 27 pg 141)

Janabe Fatema Zahra (s.a.) and remembrance of Imam Mahdi (a.t.f.s.)

"On the occasion of the Wiladat of our Master Hazrat Imam Mahdi (a.t.f.s.) 

15th Shabaan 1439 AH (2018)"

‘Arful Wardi Fee Akhbaril Mahdi’ (vol. 2, p. 166) and ‘Jam’ul Jawaam’e’ by Hafiz Jalaaluddin Suyuti (vol. 1, p. 5) report this narration from Aabri that :

Imam Muhammad Baqir (a.s.) reports from his father, Imam Zainul Abedeen (a.s.) and he from his father till the narration reaches Janabe Fatemah Zahra (s.a.) who reports,

The Holy Prophet of Islam (s.a.w.a) said," O Fatemah! I give you glad tidings of Mahdi. He is from your progeny."

Mahmood Ibn Labeed narrates:

“After the demise of the Holy Prophet (s.a.w.a.) Janabe Fatema (s.a.) used to visit the graves of the martyrs and Janabe Hamza (a.s.) and wept inconsolably. I asked her: O Leader of all women! Your weeping has broken my heart into pieces. She replied: ‘O Abu Amr! My grief is justified. I am mourning my separation from the best of among fathers and how fervently I crave his meeting’ I asked: Did the Holy Prophet (s.a.w.a.) declare the Imamate of Imam Ali (a.s.)? She said: ‘It is strange that you have forgotten Ghadeer.’ I said: I remember Ghadeer but I want to hear what the Holy Prophet (s.a.w.a.) has spoken to you. She said: ‘I swear by Allah that I have heard this from the Messenger of Allah (s.a.w.a.) – ‘Ali (a.s.) – whom I am making my successor – is the best amongst you. He is the leader and my successor and then his sons Hasan (a.s.) and Husain (a.s.) and nine Imams from Husain (a.s.)’s progeny. If you follow them you will find them as guides and will be rightly guided. And if you oppose them, you will be involved in discords and disagreements among your selves till the Day of Judgment’.’  I asked: O Lady! Why will they hold their silence? She (a.s.) explained: ‘An Imam is similar to the Holy Kaaba. The Holy Kaaba has to be visited; it does not come to you.’ Then she (a.s.) continued: ‘By the Almighty, if truth remained in its proper place there would be  no differences among even two men – till this caliphate would succeed one after the other and the ninth son from the progeny of Husain (a.s.), i.e. our Qaem (a.t.f.s.) would reappear.’

(Kefaayah al-Asar, p. 197;  Behaarul Anwaar, v. 36, p. 353, H. 224)

Fadak belonged to Hazrat Fatema Zahra (s.a.) based on Islamic laws

The Shaikhain refused to grant Fadak to Hazrat Fatima Zahra (s.a.) on one pretext or the other. They
In the absence of witnesses or rather in the absence of ‘credible’ witnesses, Hazrat Fatima Zahra’s (s.a.) claim on Fadak was rejected.

rejected her own witness as also the witnesses of her infallible husband Ameerul Momineen (a.s.) and even Umm Ayman – whose honesty was beyond reproach having been assured Paradise by the Holy Prophet (s.a.w.a.).

Over here we do not wish to delve on the infallible personalities (a.s.) and their status near Allah and the Holy Prophet (s.a.w.a.) and how the rulers made a blunder by ignoring this reality which was evident even to a Muslim child.

We only wish to draw the attention of the reader to the irregularities in the stand of the Shaikhain vis-à-vis Fadak, one of which we have exposed over here.

Granting the claimant her right based on swearing

Even if Fatima Zahra’s (s.a.) witnesses were found wanting, Fadak should have been granted to her based on a simple swearing.

It is strange that when other claims came before Abu Bakr, he allowed them in favour of the claimant merely on the basis of the claim while the claimant was neither asked to furnish any proof of claim, nor to produce witnesses.

In this connection, Bukhari documents:

‘It is related from Jabir Ibn Abdullah Ansari that he said – The Prophet of Allah (s.a.w.a.) had told me that when the spoils of war from Bahrain would arrive, he would allow me such and such out of it, but the spoils of war did not reach us until after the Prophet’s (s.a.w.a.) demise (martyrdom). It arrived in the days of (the government) of Abu Bakr, so I went to him and told him that the Prophet (s.a.w.a.) had promised to give me such and such property out of the spoils of war from Bahrain, whereupon he gave me all of what (was promised to me).’

• Sahih al-Bukhari vol 2, part 27, p 190

In the interpretation of this tradition, Ibn Hajar al-Asqalani records:

‘This tradition leads us to the conclusion that the evidence of one just companion can also be admitted as full evidence, even though it may be in his own favour, because Abu Bakr did not ask Jabir to produce any witness or proof for his claim.’

Thus, if it was lawful to grant property to Jabir on the basis of a good impression (of him and his Islam) without calling for witnesses or any evidence, then what stopped the ruler from allowing Fatima Zahra’s (s.a.) claim on the basis of a similar good impression?

Firstly, her known truthfulness and honesty was enough for holding her sincere in her claim, in addition to the witnessing of Ali (a.s.) and Umm Ayman in her favour.

Why Fatima Zahra (s.a.) preceded Ali (a.s.) in answering the oppressors during the attack

When the oppressors attacked the house of Hazrat Fatima Zahra (s.a.), they found themselves

confronting her (s.a.), rather than Ameerul Momineen, who was their real target.

The oppressor even mocked Ameerul Momineen (a.s.) by addressing Hazrat Fatima Zahra (s.a.):

What is wrong with your cousin? Why did he send you to answer the door as he sat behind the curtain?

She (s.a.) countered: It is your own oppression, you wretch that has forced me to come out thus and has bound you, as also every misguided deviator, with the argument (of personally answering the door).

• Behaar al-Anwaar v 30 p 293
• Awaalim al-Uloom v 11 part 2 p 605

By preceding Ameerul Momineen (a.s.), Hazrat Fatima Zahra (s.a.) wanted to signal to Muslims of all time the sheer oppression and deviation of the party that attacked her, despite her position as the daughter of the Holy Prophet (s.a.w.a.) and the Chief of all Women of Paradise.

When the oppressor learnt that it was Hazrat Fatima Zahra (s.a.) and NOT Ameerul Momineen (a.s.) behind the door, he should have withdrawn. But by forcibly entering the house even after this, he exposed his deep hatred for the Prophet (s.a.w.a.) and his infallible progeny, which he had kept concealed all along.

After denying Fadak why were Shaikhain buried in the Prophet’s (s.a.w.a.) house?

There are two facts that the Muslim majority accepts without much debate:         

1. The Shaikhain refused to grant Fadak to Hazrat Fatima Zahra (s.a.) by dismissing the testimonies of her infallible husband Ameerul Momineen (a.s.) and even Umm Ayman on the excuse that Prophets (s.a.w.a.) do not leave any inheritance.
2. Abu Bakr and Umar are buried next to the Holy Prophet (s.a.w.a.) by virtue of the property inherited by their daughters Ayesha and Hafsa.

Reply

The obvious contradiction between points a. and b. is plain even to a lay Muslim –

If Hazrat Fatima Zahra (s.a.) cannot inherit property from her father (s.a.w.a.) then how can the Shaikhain inherit their burial place in the Prophet’s (s.a.w.a.) house?

An eye-opening debate on the subject nullifies the burial of the Shaikhain and proves that the land on which they are buried is usurped from the Muslims.

Abu Hanifa fails to defend the Shaikhain

One day, Fuzzaal Ibn Hasan Ibn Fuzzaal al-Kufi (refer Qamoos al-Rijal, vol. 4 pg 313), a companion of Imam Jafar Sadiq (a.s.), was walking through the streets of Kufa with his friend.

He saw Abu Hanifa surrounded by people who were posing religious questions.

Fuzzaal decided to approach Abu Hanifa with some questions of his own, despite protests to the contrary by his friend, who warned him that Abu Hanifa was an intelligent person. Fuzzaal poses as a ‘Sunni’ Muslim with a Shia brother.

(We reproduce excerpts of the debate relevant to the discussion.)

Ameerul Momineen (a.s.) did not take back Fadak due to divine reward and punishment

Imam Sadiq (a.s.) informs us why Ameerul Momineen (a.s.) did not take back Fadak on assuming
caliphate.

He narrates: Ali (a.s.) did not take it back because the oppressor and the oppressed (Hazrat Fatima Zahra s.a.) had already set forth towards Allah, the Almighty. Allah had rewarded the oppressed (for patience) and had punished the oppressor (for usurping). Then Ali (a.s.) did not wish to take back something for which Allah had already punished the oppressor and had rewarded the oppressed.

• Elal al-Sharae p 155 under Chapter of ‘Why Ameerul Momineen (a.s.) left Fadak as it is on assuming caliphate’
• Awalim al-Uloom v 11 p 766

Haroon killed Imam Moosa Kazim (a.s.) over Fadak

The debate over Fadak ownership began immediately after the martyrdom of the Holy Prophet (s.a.w.a.).
But the repercussions of the debate were felt for decades since the rulers were always anxious that Aal Muhammad (a.s.) would stake a claim over it.

The following incident involving Imam Moosa Kazim (a.s.) and Haroon underscores this reality.

Haroon al-Abbasi used to tell Imam Moosa Ibn Jafar (a.s.) take Fadak since I wish to return it to you. But he (a.s.) always declined the offer.

Haroon insisted on it upon which Imam (a.s.) said – I will not accept it until it is reinstated completely with all its limits.

Haroon asked – And what are its limits?

Imam (a.s.) – If I define its limits you will never return it.

Haroon – By your grandfather you must define it.

Imam (a.s.) – As for the first limit it is Aden (Yemen). Haroon’s face changed colour.

Haroon asked Imam (a.s.) to continue.

Imam (a.s.) – The second limit is Samarqand (Uzbekistan).

Haroon’s face turned even darker.

Imam (a.s.) – The third limit is Africa.

Haroon’s face turned black. He said – Continue.

Imam (a.s.) – The fourth limit is the sea coast along the peninsula and Armenia.

Haroon – There is nothing left for us.

Imam (a.s.) – I had already told you that if I define its limits you will never return it.

It was then that Haroon decided to kill Imam Moosa Kazim (a.s.).

• Manaaqib Aal-e-Abi Talib (a.s.), vol. 4, p. 320

When Fadak came back to haunt Ayesha

In the dispute over Fadak, the rulers very conveniently presented a forged tradition to the effect that 
prophets do not leave behind any inheritance – everything they leave behind is for the nation.

Among the witnesses of the forged tradition was Ayesha and Hafsa, along with Malik Ibn Aws, a Bedouin.

Usman reminds Ayesha of her false testimony

It is related by Tabari and Thaqafi in their respective history compilations:

During the tenure of Usman, Ayesha approached him and demanded:

Grant me (the pension) bestowed upon me by my father Abu Bakr and then by Umar.

Usman retorted: I have found nothing in the Book and the Sunnah to back this grant. Rather your father and Umar granted it to you on a whim, but I will not do so.

She demanded: Grant me my inheritance from Allah’s Messenger (s.a.w.a.)?

Usman shot back: Didn’t Fatima (s.a.) approach you to seek her inheritance from Allah’s Messenger (s.a.w.a.)? But you testified along with Malik Ibn Aws al-Basri (al-Nazri) that – ‘Surely the Prophet (s.a.w.a.) did not leave inheritance. In this way you usurped the right Fatima (s.a.) sought from you.’

I will not grant you (the inheritance).

Tabari reports further – Usman said – Weren’t you (Ayesha) the one, along with the Bedouin who used to perform ablutions with his own urine, to testify near your father that the prophets do not leave anything as inheritance?

• Bait al-Ahzan p 167
• Behaar al-Anwaar v 31 p 295
• Sharh Nahj al-Balaghah v 16 p 220 (Ahle Tasannun) with variation
• Al-Amaali of Shaikh Mufeed (r.a.) p 25 with variation
• Kashf al-Ghummah v 1 p 479 with variation

Clearly Ayesha by claiming inheritance of the Holy Prophet (s.a.w.a.) rejected her own previous testimony. Even to a person like Usman, the contradiction in her stand was obvious, as was the motive behind her false testimony – to deprive Hazrat Fatima Zahra (s.a.) of her inheritance.

Greatest fear of the rulers: Fadak today, Caliphate tomorrow

It is evident from the dispute over Fadak that Hazrat Fatima Zahra (s.a.) held the upper hand.

In fact she staked her claim with such forceful arguments and irrefutable testimonies that according to some reports, the ruler of the time was compelled to issue a written decree granting her Fadak.

The all-important question is – why were the rulers so nervous about handing over Fadak to Hazrat Fatima Zahra (s.a.)?

Ibn Abil Hadid has tackled the dilemma of the rulers in his Sharh Nahj al-Balaghah.

He writes:

One of the teachers of Baghdad was asked – Wasn’t Fatima (s.a.) truthful in her claim?

Teacher replied – Yes.

The person asked – Then why didn’t Abu Bakr hand over Fadak to her while she was truthful?

Teacher – If he were to grant her Fadak based solely on her claim, then certainly she would have approached him the next day and claimed caliphate for her husband. And in this way she would have displaced him from his position (as ‘caliph’).

Then it would no longer be possible for him to offer an excuse as he had already noted that she was truthful in all her claims.

Ibn Abil Hadid mentions that this dialogue is correct.

• Sharh Nahj al-Balaghah v 16 p 284
• Ithbaat al-Hudaat v 3 p 410

Clearly the rulers deprived Hazrat Fatima Zahra (s.a.) of Fadak as their own position as ‘caliphs’ would have been endangered.

Ameerul Momineen (a.s.) sufficient as sole witness on Fadak: Example of Khuzaimah

In the dispute of Fadak, the rulers insisted that Hazrat Fatima Zahra (s.a.) present two male witnesses (or
equivalent female witnesses). When Hazrat Fatima Zahra (a.s.) presented Ameerul Momineen (a.s.) as witness they rejected his testimony as biased and insisted on other / credible witnesses.

This she (s.a.) did, but those witnesses were also dismissed.

Sole testimony of Ameerul Momineen (a.s.) was sufficient for Fadak

Fact of the matter is that there was no need for rulers to insist on two (male) witnesses when one was enough.

The personality of Ameerul Momineen (a.s.) should have sufficed as a lone witness.

Leave alone Ameerul Momineen (a.s.), by consensus of both sects, Khuzaimah Ibn Thabit was titled Zu-Shahadatain (owner of two witnesses) by the Holy Prophet (s.a.w.a.) as he considered his witness equal to two witnesses.

• Al-Ikhtesaas p 64

Others like Abu Zarr, were also known for their truthfulness and the Muslims of the time never doubt his word.

The Holy Prophet (s.a.w.a.) informed:

‘…the green sky has not sheltered, nor has the earth carried a more truthful one than Abu Zarr.’

• Al-Manaqib of Khwarazmi p 84
• Faraid al-Simtain v 1 p 166

The credentials of Ameerul Momineen (a.s.) are far higher than those of all other Muslims put together so demanding an additional witness to back his testimony is plain ignorance and stubbornness.

Ameerul Momineen (a.s.) will never deviate others on any issue..and that includes Fadak

Maulana Syed Ali Raza Rizvi, Shahadat-e-bibi Fatema Zahra (s.a)

Excellent majalis on Shahadat of Hazrat Zahra (sa) 

CLICK HERE TO WATCH ON YOUTUBE

يارب محمد عجل فرج آل محمد

 يارب محمد أحفظ غيبة أبنه محمد

 يارب محمـــد أنتقم لأبنه محمـــد

"O Lord of Muhammad! Hasten the reappearance of the progeny of Muhammad. 

O Lord of Muhammad! Protect the occultation of Muhammad. 

O Lord of Muhammad! Hasten the revenge of daughter of Muhammad.”

Why do we observe Ayyam-e-Fatimiyah(sa). Video Clip in Urdu

CLICK HERE TO WATCH ON YOUTUBE

يارب محمد عجل فرج آل محمد

 يارب محمد أحفظ غيبة أبنه محمد

 يارب محمـــد أنتقم لأبنه محمـــد

"O Lord of Muhammad! Hasten the reappearance of the progeny of Muhammad. 

O Lord of Muhammad! Protect the occultation of Muhammad. 

O Lord of Muhammad! Hasten the revenge of daughter of Muhammad.”

2018 - Ayyam-e-Fatimiyyah - اياّم فاطميه - Clip 1: Maulan Syed Ahmed Ali Abidi Sahab

يارب محمد عجل فرج آل محمد

 يارب محمد أحفظ غيبة أبنه محمد

 يارب محمـــد أنتقم لأبنه محمـــد

"O Lord of Muhammad! Hasten the reappearance of the progeny of Muhammad. 

O Lord of Muhammad! Protect the occultation of Muhammad. 

O Lord of Muhammad! Hasten the revenge of daughter of Muhammad.”